May 24, 2006
May 24, 2006Housing
This morning’s report of April’s 4.9% increase in new home sales is nothing more than an aberration in a growing bear market for house prices. Buried deep in the report was the fact that sales for January, February and March 2006 were revised downward with March leading the way with a revision of -71,000. Sales are NOT the big story as prices of new single family homes have increased only 0.9% in the last twelve months and a record 565,000 homes are sitting on the market waiting for buyers. This supply represents 5.8 months of sales and unless we see a recovery in June (usually the strongest month for home prices each year) we are sure to see more record increases in supply and the beginning of what should be a slow, painful period for home owners that are praying for higher prices so that the ATM machine (house) never runs out of money. I often read that the housing market will stay strong until the economy and job market softens. With over 40% of new jobs in the US coming from real estate in the last 3 years it should only be a few more months before a massive exodus occurs in many of the RE related industries. This morning’s Seattle Times headline “WaMu slashing 850 local jobs” isn’t surprising as this is a continuation of a trend that began earlier this year.
From Sacramento we see that more homeowners are behind on their mortgage payments. One mortgage broker commented correctly that “many people can’t afford both rising mortgage payments and their cars, credit cards and other amenities.” The Fed tightens, oil prices rise and the homeowners’ last option continues to be the refi…soon that door will shut tight. Stable house prices will place many homeowners in a position where massive spending cuts will be the only route to prevent eventual foreclosure…..it’s not pretty and I really don’t see any other way out for the many thousands who purchased houses/condos with no money down……
When prices rise, supply increases and then…
According the World Gold Council jewelry demand fell 22% in the first quarter of 2006 as the price of gold rose to a 26 year high. Almost 2/3 of global jewelry demand comes from Asia and the Middle East but even regular buyers slow down their purchases when prices rise. So why did the price of gold continue to rise until about a week ago? Billions are being invested this year in commodity funds and ETF’s (exchange traded funds) as the individual investor chases the mirage of big profits from the rise of metals and other “hot” commodities. The problem is that with growing markets everyone seems to want to enter and exit at the same time and that is why we are witnessing such large movements (gold down $20 today) over the past few days. Last week I wrote about the fact that traded commodity prices have risen almost 35% more this year than those that don’t have publicly traded markets. Corn futures are publicly traded and have risen almost 20 cents a bushel since March but mostly due to heavy demand from these “new” hedge funds. The cash price of corn that farmers and others involved in the business have NOT risen at all and that may be the most important point to emphasize in this atmosphere of inflationary expectations. It appears that the demand for most commodities that have risen this year is not coming from normal places (producers, growers, end users) etc. but from speculators who would never want to actually take delivery of the product or commodity that they have bought….the big question will soon be asked: To whom are they planning on selling when they want or have to get out? With the Fed having raised short term interest rates for the past 23 months the cost of carry has become expensive for these hedge funds and if these markets don’t continue to rise it will become very painful to just hold on to existing positions.
June 30th: Will the Fed raise rates again?
The next FOMC meeting will take place on June 29th & 30th and much can happen in the economy before the meeting and Chairman Bernanke is hoping that a definitive trend begins that will make his decision easier than if it need to be made today. The new Fed Chairman’s credibility has been criticized over the past few weeks as he clearly has seemed confused about future Fed policy and somehow disclosed publicly (to CNBC’s Maria Bartiromo) that Fed policy was still to be determined…Yesterday he actually scored a few “cred” points when testifying before the Senate Banking Committee that the conversation with CNBC “was a lapse in judgement on my part” and that in the future “my communications with the public and with the markets will be entirely through regular and formal channels.” (FOMC statements). This is a start and we must remember that Mr. Greenspan made similar communication errors in his first year (1987). The Fed has appox. 30 days to determine whether it feels it needs to tighten again on June 30th by raising the Fed Funds rate by 25 basis points. We will have many economic releases during this period including tomorrow’s GDP report, Friday’s PCE (inflation) report and of course the employment report on Friday June 2nd. Even though the Fed has said it is “data dependent” it must be careful that it doesn’t react to current or past economic growth numbers because monetary policy clearly has a 12-18 month delay and what appears to be inflationary fires today might turn out to be economic weakness and/or low inflation in 2007 when the effects of an increase in short term rates actually filters thru the US economy. It is a tough job and that is why there have only been five Fed Chairman in the past 30+ years. There are two important points that Mr. Bernanke and the FOMC will consider before making any decision in policy. 1) Over the past 30+ years inflation has peaked approximately 15 months after the peak in GDP growth and that would put the peak of inflation in early 2007 which is less than the 12-18 month lag from Fed monetary policy. 2) IF and it is a big IF the Fed raises the Funds rate to 5.25% on June 30th and IF the 10 year T-Note stays around 5.00% we will have a 35% of having a recession later this year. This probability comes from the “famous” 1996 study done by the NY Fed at the request of former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan. The interest rate market should give us the answer over the next 4 weeks so I would urge everyone to pay close attention to the rate on the 10 year Treasury. A declining rate will give the Fed cover for no rate increase but a rising rate will leave the Fed no choice but to raise the Funds rate to 5.25%. Stay tuned…..it’s going to be a volatile and exciting June in interest rate land.
