Mortgage Rates climbing but NOT because of rising inflation
July 24, 2008
This morning Freddie Mac released its weekly survey of residential mortgage rates and announced they have risen to levels not seen in a year. A 30-year fixed rate loan averaged 6.63% and the chief economist for the agency said it was because of market concerns about rising inflation and expectations that the Fed will raise short-term rates later this year. It amazes me that these so called “experts” continue to mislead the public with information that is far from accurate. Mortgage rates are higher because Fannie and Freddie have increased fees and spreads on loans they purchase as they desperately attempt to stay alive and away from a complete federal government takeover.
Inflation
It’s important to analyze the recent trend in long-term interest rates and let’s begin with the fact that the 10-year Treasury rate (4.01%) has two components representing a real rate of return (1.68%) and inflation component (2.33%). These numbers can be viewed each day at Bloomberg.com by subtracting the 10-year TIPS yield from the actual 10-year rate and arriving at the inflation component. On June 16th the 10-year reached its peak for this year at 4.27% and the inflation component was 2.53% (representing investor’s inflation expectations for the next 10-years). On July 10th the 10-year fell to 3.80% and the real rate was 1.36% (representing investor expectations of economic growth over the next 10 years). The 10-year had fallen 47 basis points in less than a month but most of the decline was due to reduced expectations of economic growth NOT a lowering of inflationary expectations. Today with the 10-year at 4.01% the inflation component is at 2.33% down 20 basis points from its level of a month ago. I know this is a lot of numbers and data but the bottom line is that inflation expectations are FALLING even though long-term rates have risen in the past few weeks. You can find these numbers yourself each day and not have to believe what you read from the economists who have missed the majority of the housing crises and interest rate move lower. In May 2007 (see archives) we saw almost the exact same situation with a dramatic rise in long-term rates to 5.30% on the 10-year with forecasters saying it was because of rising inflation fears when the actual numbers told a very different story. Oil has pulled back sharply in the past few weeks and this has had a positive impact on future expectations of inflation. Long Treasury rates have risen because expectations the U.S. economy will soon be growing at a faster rate WITHOUT rising inflation. Higher oil prices are NOT inflationary if consumers spend less on other goods and services while spending more on gasoline purchases. 70% of inflation is created through higher wages and we are not seeing wage inflation at this point in the economic cycle and with a rising unemployment rate many will soon be faced with accepting any job available at a low wage rate. It’s simply Economics 101, when supply (jobs) increases relative to demand (slowing business) prices (wages) go lower.
The Fed
The second part of today’s press release by Freddie Mac spoke about a greater probability of an increase in the overnight Funds rate this year. It is very doubtful that the Fed will raise short-term rates this year and with unemployment rising, house values falling and credit impossible to obtain for almost everyone why would the Fed RAISE rates? Strengthen the dollar? Doubtful. That is what caused the stock market crash in 1987 and forced us into a depression in the early 1930’s. It has been over a decade since Fed interest rate movements had any effect on long-term rates. In fact one of former Chairman Greenspan’s greatest frustrations was that long-term rates did NOT rise when the Fed raised rates from 2004-2006. He said many times he wanted long rates to rise to curtail loan demand from homebuyers. Long-term rates are a function of inflationary expectations and frequently go in the opposite direction of Fed Funds movements. The Fed would need to increase the Funds rate if loan demand was soaring but it is almost impossible for the average borrower to obtain credit today because banks can’t lend what they don’t have and it will take many years of a positively sloped yield curve for them to create enough profits to begin lending again. Credit continues to contract each week led by the real estate sector and when accompanied by declining asset values has always led to DEFLATION.
State economies (50 stories)
Never in our history have we seen such divergence in the direction of individual state economies. A report from the National Conference of State Legislatures shows that “states that have significant portions of their tax bases tied to natural resources seem to have escaped major budget problems.” With home values declining many counties are being forced to reduce property taxes and that will soon cause tremendous strain on municipal budgets and force federal government support. The one employment category that is sure to increase in the next five years is from government agencies that will be used to increase regulation in the mortgage/lending area and disburse billions in government assistance to state and local governments that will declare bankruptcy without the help. Texas continues to lead the way in job opportunities and wage growth and saw an increase in construction jobs last month. For those seeking opportunities in multi-family buildings Texas offers one of the few bull markets remaining in the commercial real estate sector.
The Fed’s Beige Book which analyses economic activity in each Fed District had a few interesting tidbits in yesterday’s report. Regarding the cracking commercial real estate market the Boston Fed described conditions as “morose”, a word I couldn’t find ever used before in this report. If conditions deteriorate as I am sure they will what word will they use? The Cleveland Fed reported smaller banks receiving more deposits as a result of a flight to safety by investors. My concern is whether these are brokered deposits of under $100,000 to take advantage of the safety net provided by the FDIC. This could be a major problem in 2009-10 if investors flood into weak bank CD’s at higher than market rates due to the guarantee by a government agency. Regarding inflation worries many Fed districts forwarded comments from companies that “sluggish demand has made it difficult to raise prices.” If customers believed inflation was coming soon they wouldn’t care about current prices because of fears that prices were sure to be higher next year.
Has anything changed?
I began the year (see archives) stating this would be a slow developing bear market for real estate prices and that the commercial market would begin a nasty decline which is exactly what is now occurring throughout many parts of the U.S. The federal government has stepped in with $100+ billion of stimulus checks which were mostly used for gasoline purchases and other non-luxury items. A 2nd stimulus program may soon be needed but in an election year it might be difficult to reach a consensus from Congress. I am stunned by the lack of concern for the economy from both Presidential candidates, they act like it is a typical election year and are clearly not prepared for the carnage we will soon see as bankruptcy and unemployment rates soar to levels not seen for decades. My biggest worry is that the majority of people continue to act as if they have seen this play before and the last act ends with the economy roaring back to normal growth due to lower interest rates, easy credit and government help. How could anyone believe anything other than from their own experiences? Counter trend rallies in stocks and rates will convince many the worst is over and one must remember the sharpest and most violent rallies always occur in the worst and longest bear markets. The best advice is the most difficult…pay down debt, de-leverage, increase savings…the best investment opportunities are ahead but they will arrive in a years not months.
